Review



mouse cxcl16 antibody  (Bio-Techne corporation)


Bioz Verified Symbol Bio-Techne corporation is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Bio-Techne corporation manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 94

    Structured Review

    Bio-Techne corporation mouse cxcl16 antibody
    Mouse Cxcl16 Antibody, supplied by Bio-Techne corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 28 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse cxcl16 antibody/product/Bio-Techne corporation
    Average 94 stars, based on 28 article reviews
    mouse cxcl16 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    94/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    94
    R&D Systems anti cxcl16
    Anti Cxcl16, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti cxcl16/product/R&D Systems
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti cxcl16 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Sino Biological rabbit anti mouse cxcl16
    Rabbit Anti Mouse Cxcl16, supplied by Sino Biological, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit anti mouse cxcl16/product/Sino Biological
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit anti mouse cxcl16 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Proteintech mouse monoclonal anti glyceraldehyde
    Mouse Monoclonal Anti Glyceraldehyde, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse monoclonal anti glyceraldehyde/product/Proteintech
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse monoclonal anti glyceraldehyde - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Proteintech mouse mab
    Mouse Mab, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse mab/product/Proteintech
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse mab - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Proteintech gadph mouse monoclonal antibody
    Gadph Mouse Monoclonal Antibody, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/gadph mouse monoclonal antibody/product/Proteintech
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    gadph mouse monoclonal antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Proteintech mouse monoclonal antibody subtype elisa kit
    Mouse Monoclonal Antibody Subtype Elisa Kit, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse monoclonal antibody subtype elisa kit/product/Proteintech
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse monoclonal antibody subtype elisa kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    R&D Systems anti cxcl16 antibody
    a UMAP plot of subclustering of myeloid cells. b The distribution of myeloid subclusters in each group in the extranodal tissues and SP revealed by R o/e analysis. +++ indicates R o/e ≥ 3; ++, 2 ≤ R o/e < 3; +, 1.5 ≤ R o/e < 2; +/−, 0.67 ≤ R o/e < 1.5; −, 0 ≤ R o/e < 0.67. c GSEA analysis of scRNA-seq data comparing each myeloid cell subcluster from pre-tumor samples (SG and SP from WT and Trp53 − / − mice) and Trp53 − / − tumor samples (top) and from Trp53 − / − and Trp53 − / − LMP1 + tumor samples (bottom). Signatures significant (FDR < 0.1) across at least two subclusters are shown. d Comparison of outgoing and incoming signals between Trp53 − / − and Trp53 − / − LMP1 + tumors in CellChat analysis. e Relative IFN-γ expressions in Lin − CD122 + cells from Trp53 − / − (n = 4) and Trp53 − / − LMP1 + (n = 3) tumors by intracellular flow cytometry. f Chord diagram of Ifng -( Ifngr1 + Ifngr2 ) (left), <t>Cxcl16</t> - Cxcr6 (middle), and Cxcl9 - Cxcr3 (right) signaling network across subclusters in Trp53 − / − and Trp53 − / − LMP1 + tumors. g Relative CXCR6 (left) and CXCR3 (right) expressions in Lin − CD122 + cells from Trp53 − / − (n = 4) and Trp53 − / − LMP1 + (n = 4) tumors by flow cytometry. h CXCR6 (left) and CXCR3 (right) gene expressions in human normal NK cells (n = 4) and ENKTCL tumors (n = 41) by RNA-seq. i Representative images of CXCR6 (left) and CXCR3 (right) immunostaining in a human ENKTCL sample. j Relative cell number of Trp53 − / − and Trp53 − / − LMP1 + tumor cells 48 h after CXCL16 or CXCL9 treatment at indicated concentrations (n = 4). k The number of Trp53 − / − LMP1 + tumor cells after one week of co-culture with and without cDC (n = 6). l Kaplan–Meier survival curves of mice transplanted with 5 × 10 5 Trp53 − / − LMP1 + tumor cells and administered with anti-CXCL16 antibody (n = 6) or isotype control (n = 8). Log-rank test. m Kaplan–Meier survival curves of WT or Cxcl16 knockout mice transplanted with 5 × 10 5 Trp53 − / − LMP1 + tumor cells and administered with control vehicle or anti-KLRG1 antibody (n = 7 per group). Log-rank test. g , j lines show means. h , k Box plots show medians (lines), IQRs (boxes), and ±1.5× IQR (whiskers). e , g , h , j , and k NS: not significant, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.005, ***P < 0.0005, two-sided Welch’s t-test. No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons. e , g , h , and j – m Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
    Anti Cxcl16 Antibody, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti cxcl16 antibody/product/R&D Systems
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti cxcl16 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    R&D Systems mouse cxcl16 antibody mab503
    NT CD4 TRM rely on <t>CXCR6-CXCL16</t> axis for their formation A) Box plot showing the expression of Cxcr6 mRNA among CD4 TRM of the NT and lungs. Data are presented as median and interquartile range. NS, not significant, **** P <0.0001; *** P <0.001; ** P <0.01; * P <0.05 by unpaired two-tailed t-test. B) Box plot showing the expression of Cxcr6 mRNA among different cell clusters of lungs and NT. Data are presented as median and interquartile range. NS, not significant, **** P <0.0001; *** P <0.001; ** P <0.01; * P <0.05 by Wilcoxon rank sum test with Benjamini-Hochberg correction C) Volcano plot for differential expressed genes in the NT in comparison to the lungs of the Th17 cluster. The dotted lines indicate fold change and adjusted p value cutoffs. D) Bar plot for the expression of CXCR6 (each Median Fluorescence Intensity (MFI) normalized to mean MFI from CD4 TEM iv + of NT) in CD4 TRM and iv + CD4 TEM from the lungs and NT of naïve mice and PR8 IAV infected mice (30 dpi) as indicated. The experiment was repeated thrice and the results (mean ± s.e.m.) are pooled. NS, not significant, **** P <0.0001; *** P <0.001; ** P <0.01; * P <0.05 by two-way ANOVA, with Tukey’s multiple comparison test. E-F) Expression of CXCR6 on OT-II CD4 TRM of NT and lung on d30 following PR8-Ova infection as indicated. E) Representative histograms for CXCR6 expression from OT-II CD4 TRM of NT and lung are shown. F) Scatter plot showing the expression of CXCR6 (each Median Fluorescence Intensity (MFI) normalized to mean MFI of NT OT-II CD4 TRM). The experiment was repeated thrice and the results (mean ± s.e.m.) are pooled. NS, not significant, **** P <0.0001; *** P <0.001; ** P <0.01; * P <0.05 by unpaired two- tailed t-test. G-J) Frequency of different cell populations within different organs derived from WT- Cxcr6 -/- BM chimeric mice on day 30 post infection with PR8 IAV as indicated. G) Schematic representation of the experimental setup. H) Representative flow cytometry plots showing the percentage of WT and Cxcr6 -/- CD4 TRM in NT and lungs. I) Scatter plot for the percentage of WT and Cxcr6 -/- CD4 TRM in NT and lungs as indicated. J) Scatter plot for the percentage of I-A b NP306-322 tetramer - specific WT and Cxcr6 -/- CD4 TRM in NT and lungs as indicated. The experiment was repeated thrice and the results (mean ± s.e.m.) are pooled. NS, not significant, **** P <0.0001; *** P <0.001; ** P <0.01; * P <0.05 by unpaired two-tailed t-test. K) A representative microscopic image of CXCL16 expression (magenta) and OT-II CD4 T cells (red and green) in the olfactory epithelium of the murine NT. NT is isolated on day 30 post PR8-Ova infection from mice that received OT-II CD4 T cells. L-N) Antigen-specific CD4 TRM in the lungs and NT of mice treated with isotype control or anti-CXCL16 antibody on day 10 post PR8 IAV infection. L) Schematic representation of the experimental setup. M) Representative flow cytometry plots indicating the percentage of I-A b NP306-322 tetramer - specific CD4 TRM are shown. N) Scatter plot indicating the absolute number of I-A b NP306-322 tetramer - specific CD4 TRM. The experiment was performed twice and the results (mean ± s.e.m.) are pooled. NS, not significant, **** P <0.0001; *** P <0.001; ** P <0.01; * P <0.05 by unpaired two-tailed t- test.
    Mouse Cxcl16 Antibody Mab503, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse cxcl16 antibody mab503/product/R&D Systems
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse cxcl16 antibody mab503 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    R&D Systems anti cxcl16 neutralizing antibody
    NT CD4 TRM rely on <t>CXCR6-CXCL16</t> axis for their formation A) Box plot showing the expression of Cxcr6 mRNA among CD4 TRM of the NT and lungs. Data are presented as median and interquartile range. NS, not significant, **** P <0.0001; *** P <0.001; ** P <0.01; * P <0.05 by unpaired two-tailed t-test. B) Box plot showing the expression of Cxcr6 mRNA among different cell clusters of lungs and NT. Data are presented as median and interquartile range. NS, not significant, **** P <0.0001; *** P <0.001; ** P <0.01; * P <0.05 by Wilcoxon rank sum test with Benjamini-Hochberg correction C) Volcano plot for differential expressed genes in the NT in comparison to the lungs of the Th17 cluster. The dotted lines indicate fold change and adjusted p value cutoffs. D) Bar plot for the expression of CXCR6 (each Median Fluorescence Intensity (MFI) normalized to mean MFI from CD4 TEM iv + of NT) in CD4 TRM and iv + CD4 TEM from the lungs and NT of naïve mice and PR8 IAV infected mice (30 dpi) as indicated. The experiment was repeated thrice and the results (mean ± s.e.m.) are pooled. NS, not significant, **** P <0.0001; *** P <0.001; ** P <0.01; * P <0.05 by two-way ANOVA, with Tukey’s multiple comparison test. E-F) Expression of CXCR6 on OT-II CD4 TRM of NT and lung on d30 following PR8-Ova infection as indicated. E) Representative histograms for CXCR6 expression from OT-II CD4 TRM of NT and lung are shown. F) Scatter plot showing the expression of CXCR6 (each Median Fluorescence Intensity (MFI) normalized to mean MFI of NT OT-II CD4 TRM). The experiment was repeated thrice and the results (mean ± s.e.m.) are pooled. NS, not significant, **** P <0.0001; *** P <0.001; ** P <0.01; * P <0.05 by unpaired two- tailed t-test. G-J) Frequency of different cell populations within different organs derived from WT- Cxcr6 -/- BM chimeric mice on day 30 post infection with PR8 IAV as indicated. G) Schematic representation of the experimental setup. H) Representative flow cytometry plots showing the percentage of WT and Cxcr6 -/- CD4 TRM in NT and lungs. I) Scatter plot for the percentage of WT and Cxcr6 -/- CD4 TRM in NT and lungs as indicated. J) Scatter plot for the percentage of I-A b NP306-322 tetramer - specific WT and Cxcr6 -/- CD4 TRM in NT and lungs as indicated. The experiment was repeated thrice and the results (mean ± s.e.m.) are pooled. NS, not significant, **** P <0.0001; *** P <0.001; ** P <0.01; * P <0.05 by unpaired two-tailed t-test. K) A representative microscopic image of CXCL16 expression (magenta) and OT-II CD4 T cells (red and green) in the olfactory epithelium of the murine NT. NT is isolated on day 30 post PR8-Ova infection from mice that received OT-II CD4 T cells. L-N) Antigen-specific CD4 TRM in the lungs and NT of mice treated with isotype control or anti-CXCL16 antibody on day 10 post PR8 IAV infection. L) Schematic representation of the experimental setup. M) Representative flow cytometry plots indicating the percentage of I-A b NP306-322 tetramer - specific CD4 TRM are shown. N) Scatter plot indicating the absolute number of I-A b NP306-322 tetramer - specific CD4 TRM. The experiment was performed twice and the results (mean ± s.e.m.) are pooled. NS, not significant, **** P <0.0001; *** P <0.001; ** P <0.01; * P <0.05 by unpaired two-tailed t- test.
    Anti Cxcl16 Neutralizing Antibody, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti cxcl16 neutralizing antibody/product/R&D Systems
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti cxcl16 neutralizing antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Bio-Techne corporation mouse cxcl16 antibody
    NT CD4 TRM rely on <t>CXCR6-CXCL16</t> axis for their formation A) Box plot showing the expression of Cxcr6 mRNA among CD4 TRM of the NT and lungs. Data are presented as median and interquartile range. NS, not significant, **** P <0.0001; *** P <0.001; ** P <0.01; * P <0.05 by unpaired two-tailed t-test. B) Box plot showing the expression of Cxcr6 mRNA among different cell clusters of lungs and NT. Data are presented as median and interquartile range. NS, not significant, **** P <0.0001; *** P <0.001; ** P <0.01; * P <0.05 by Wilcoxon rank sum test with Benjamini-Hochberg correction C) Volcano plot for differential expressed genes in the NT in comparison to the lungs of the Th17 cluster. The dotted lines indicate fold change and adjusted p value cutoffs. D) Bar plot for the expression of CXCR6 (each Median Fluorescence Intensity (MFI) normalized to mean MFI from CD4 TEM iv + of NT) in CD4 TRM and iv + CD4 TEM from the lungs and NT of naïve mice and PR8 IAV infected mice (30 dpi) as indicated. The experiment was repeated thrice and the results (mean ± s.e.m.) are pooled. NS, not significant, **** P <0.0001; *** P <0.001; ** P <0.01; * P <0.05 by two-way ANOVA, with Tukey’s multiple comparison test. E-F) Expression of CXCR6 on OT-II CD4 TRM of NT and lung on d30 following PR8-Ova infection as indicated. E) Representative histograms for CXCR6 expression from OT-II CD4 TRM of NT and lung are shown. F) Scatter plot showing the expression of CXCR6 (each Median Fluorescence Intensity (MFI) normalized to mean MFI of NT OT-II CD4 TRM). The experiment was repeated thrice and the results (mean ± s.e.m.) are pooled. NS, not significant, **** P <0.0001; *** P <0.001; ** P <0.01; * P <0.05 by unpaired two- tailed t-test. G-J) Frequency of different cell populations within different organs derived from WT- Cxcr6 -/- BM chimeric mice on day 30 post infection with PR8 IAV as indicated. G) Schematic representation of the experimental setup. H) Representative flow cytometry plots showing the percentage of WT and Cxcr6 -/- CD4 TRM in NT and lungs. I) Scatter plot for the percentage of WT and Cxcr6 -/- CD4 TRM in NT and lungs as indicated. J) Scatter plot for the percentage of I-A b NP306-322 tetramer - specific WT and Cxcr6 -/- CD4 TRM in NT and lungs as indicated. The experiment was repeated thrice and the results (mean ± s.e.m.) are pooled. NS, not significant, **** P <0.0001; *** P <0.001; ** P <0.01; * P <0.05 by unpaired two-tailed t-test. K) A representative microscopic image of CXCL16 expression (magenta) and OT-II CD4 T cells (red and green) in the olfactory epithelium of the murine NT. NT is isolated on day 30 post PR8-Ova infection from mice that received OT-II CD4 T cells. L-N) Antigen-specific CD4 TRM in the lungs and NT of mice treated with isotype control or anti-CXCL16 antibody on day 10 post PR8 IAV infection. L) Schematic representation of the experimental setup. M) Representative flow cytometry plots indicating the percentage of I-A b NP306-322 tetramer - specific CD4 TRM are shown. N) Scatter plot indicating the absolute number of I-A b NP306-322 tetramer - specific CD4 TRM. The experiment was performed twice and the results (mean ± s.e.m.) are pooled. NS, not significant, **** P <0.0001; *** P <0.001; ** P <0.01; * P <0.05 by unpaired two-tailed t- test.
    Mouse Cxcl16 Antibody, supplied by Bio-Techne corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse cxcl16 antibody/product/Bio-Techne corporation
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse cxcl16 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    a UMAP plot of subclustering of myeloid cells. b The distribution of myeloid subclusters in each group in the extranodal tissues and SP revealed by R o/e analysis. +++ indicates R o/e ≥ 3; ++, 2 ≤ R o/e < 3; +, 1.5 ≤ R o/e < 2; +/−, 0.67 ≤ R o/e < 1.5; −, 0 ≤ R o/e < 0.67. c GSEA analysis of scRNA-seq data comparing each myeloid cell subcluster from pre-tumor samples (SG and SP from WT and Trp53 − / − mice) and Trp53 − / − tumor samples (top) and from Trp53 − / − and Trp53 − / − LMP1 + tumor samples (bottom). Signatures significant (FDR < 0.1) across at least two subclusters are shown. d Comparison of outgoing and incoming signals between Trp53 − / − and Trp53 − / − LMP1 + tumors in CellChat analysis. e Relative IFN-γ expressions in Lin − CD122 + cells from Trp53 − / − (n = 4) and Trp53 − / − LMP1 + (n = 3) tumors by intracellular flow cytometry. f Chord diagram of Ifng -( Ifngr1 + Ifngr2 ) (left), Cxcl16 - Cxcr6 (middle), and Cxcl9 - Cxcr3 (right) signaling network across subclusters in Trp53 − / − and Trp53 − / − LMP1 + tumors. g Relative CXCR6 (left) and CXCR3 (right) expressions in Lin − CD122 + cells from Trp53 − / − (n = 4) and Trp53 − / − LMP1 + (n = 4) tumors by flow cytometry. h CXCR6 (left) and CXCR3 (right) gene expressions in human normal NK cells (n = 4) and ENKTCL tumors (n = 41) by RNA-seq. i Representative images of CXCR6 (left) and CXCR3 (right) immunostaining in a human ENKTCL sample. j Relative cell number of Trp53 − / − and Trp53 − / − LMP1 + tumor cells 48 h after CXCL16 or CXCL9 treatment at indicated concentrations (n = 4). k The number of Trp53 − / − LMP1 + tumor cells after one week of co-culture with and without cDC (n = 6). l Kaplan–Meier survival curves of mice transplanted with 5 × 10 5 Trp53 − / − LMP1 + tumor cells and administered with anti-CXCL16 antibody (n = 6) or isotype control (n = 8). Log-rank test. m Kaplan–Meier survival curves of WT or Cxcl16 knockout mice transplanted with 5 × 10 5 Trp53 − / − LMP1 + tumor cells and administered with control vehicle or anti-KLRG1 antibody (n = 7 per group). Log-rank test. g , j lines show means. h , k Box plots show medians (lines), IQRs (boxes), and ±1.5× IQR (whiskers). e , g , h , j , and k NS: not significant, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.005, ***P < 0.0005, two-sided Welch’s t-test. No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons. e , g , h , and j – m Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

    Journal: Nature Communications

    Article Title: Modeling NK-cell lymphoma in mice reveals its cell-of-origin and microenvironmental changes and identifies therapeutic targets

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-53376-1

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a UMAP plot of subclustering of myeloid cells. b The distribution of myeloid subclusters in each group in the extranodal tissues and SP revealed by R o/e analysis. +++ indicates R o/e ≥ 3; ++, 2 ≤ R o/e < 3; +, 1.5 ≤ R o/e < 2; +/−, 0.67 ≤ R o/e < 1.5; −, 0 ≤ R o/e < 0.67. c GSEA analysis of scRNA-seq data comparing each myeloid cell subcluster from pre-tumor samples (SG and SP from WT and Trp53 − / − mice) and Trp53 − / − tumor samples (top) and from Trp53 − / − and Trp53 − / − LMP1 + tumor samples (bottom). Signatures significant (FDR < 0.1) across at least two subclusters are shown. d Comparison of outgoing and incoming signals between Trp53 − / − and Trp53 − / − LMP1 + tumors in CellChat analysis. e Relative IFN-γ expressions in Lin − CD122 + cells from Trp53 − / − (n = 4) and Trp53 − / − LMP1 + (n = 3) tumors by intracellular flow cytometry. f Chord diagram of Ifng -( Ifngr1 + Ifngr2 ) (left), Cxcl16 - Cxcr6 (middle), and Cxcl9 - Cxcr3 (right) signaling network across subclusters in Trp53 − / − and Trp53 − / − LMP1 + tumors. g Relative CXCR6 (left) and CXCR3 (right) expressions in Lin − CD122 + cells from Trp53 − / − (n = 4) and Trp53 − / − LMP1 + (n = 4) tumors by flow cytometry. h CXCR6 (left) and CXCR3 (right) gene expressions in human normal NK cells (n = 4) and ENKTCL tumors (n = 41) by RNA-seq. i Representative images of CXCR6 (left) and CXCR3 (right) immunostaining in a human ENKTCL sample. j Relative cell number of Trp53 − / − and Trp53 − / − LMP1 + tumor cells 48 h after CXCL16 or CXCL9 treatment at indicated concentrations (n = 4). k The number of Trp53 − / − LMP1 + tumor cells after one week of co-culture with and without cDC (n = 6). l Kaplan–Meier survival curves of mice transplanted with 5 × 10 5 Trp53 − / − LMP1 + tumor cells and administered with anti-CXCL16 antibody (n = 6) or isotype control (n = 8). Log-rank test. m Kaplan–Meier survival curves of WT or Cxcl16 knockout mice transplanted with 5 × 10 5 Trp53 − / − LMP1 + tumor cells and administered with control vehicle or anti-KLRG1 antibody (n = 7 per group). Log-rank test. g , j lines show means. h , k Box plots show medians (lines), IQRs (boxes), and ±1.5× IQR (whiskers). e , g , h , j , and k NS: not significant, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.005, ***P < 0.0005, two-sided Welch’s t-test. No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons. e , g , h , and j – m Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

    Article Snippet: Five mg/kg of anti-CXCL16 antibody (R&D Systems) or their isotype Rat IgG2A antibody (R&D Systems) was administered intraperitoneally every one week beginning from day 5 post-transplantation.

    Techniques: Comparison, Flow Cytometry, RNA Sequencing Assay, Immunostaining, Co-Culture Assay, Control, Knock-Out

    NT CD4 TRM rely on CXCR6-CXCL16 axis for their formation A) Box plot showing the expression of Cxcr6 mRNA among CD4 TRM of the NT and lungs. Data are presented as median and interquartile range. NS, not significant, **** P <0.0001; *** P <0.001; ** P <0.01; * P <0.05 by unpaired two-tailed t-test. B) Box plot showing the expression of Cxcr6 mRNA among different cell clusters of lungs and NT. Data are presented as median and interquartile range. NS, not significant, **** P <0.0001; *** P <0.001; ** P <0.01; * P <0.05 by Wilcoxon rank sum test with Benjamini-Hochberg correction C) Volcano plot for differential expressed genes in the NT in comparison to the lungs of the Th17 cluster. The dotted lines indicate fold change and adjusted p value cutoffs. D) Bar plot for the expression of CXCR6 (each Median Fluorescence Intensity (MFI) normalized to mean MFI from CD4 TEM iv + of NT) in CD4 TRM and iv + CD4 TEM from the lungs and NT of naïve mice and PR8 IAV infected mice (30 dpi) as indicated. The experiment was repeated thrice and the results (mean ± s.e.m.) are pooled. NS, not significant, **** P <0.0001; *** P <0.001; ** P <0.01; * P <0.05 by two-way ANOVA, with Tukey’s multiple comparison test. E-F) Expression of CXCR6 on OT-II CD4 TRM of NT and lung on d30 following PR8-Ova infection as indicated. E) Representative histograms for CXCR6 expression from OT-II CD4 TRM of NT and lung are shown. F) Scatter plot showing the expression of CXCR6 (each Median Fluorescence Intensity (MFI) normalized to mean MFI of NT OT-II CD4 TRM). The experiment was repeated thrice and the results (mean ± s.e.m.) are pooled. NS, not significant, **** P <0.0001; *** P <0.001; ** P <0.01; * P <0.05 by unpaired two- tailed t-test. G-J) Frequency of different cell populations within different organs derived from WT- Cxcr6 -/- BM chimeric mice on day 30 post infection with PR8 IAV as indicated. G) Schematic representation of the experimental setup. H) Representative flow cytometry plots showing the percentage of WT and Cxcr6 -/- CD4 TRM in NT and lungs. I) Scatter plot for the percentage of WT and Cxcr6 -/- CD4 TRM in NT and lungs as indicated. J) Scatter plot for the percentage of I-A b NP306-322 tetramer - specific WT and Cxcr6 -/- CD4 TRM in NT and lungs as indicated. The experiment was repeated thrice and the results (mean ± s.e.m.) are pooled. NS, not significant, **** P <0.0001; *** P <0.001; ** P <0.01; * P <0.05 by unpaired two-tailed t-test. K) A representative microscopic image of CXCL16 expression (magenta) and OT-II CD4 T cells (red and green) in the olfactory epithelium of the murine NT. NT is isolated on day 30 post PR8-Ova infection from mice that received OT-II CD4 T cells. L-N) Antigen-specific CD4 TRM in the lungs and NT of mice treated with isotype control or anti-CXCL16 antibody on day 10 post PR8 IAV infection. L) Schematic representation of the experimental setup. M) Representative flow cytometry plots indicating the percentage of I-A b NP306-322 tetramer - specific CD4 TRM are shown. N) Scatter plot indicating the absolute number of I-A b NP306-322 tetramer - specific CD4 TRM. The experiment was performed twice and the results (mean ± s.e.m.) are pooled. NS, not significant, **** P <0.0001; *** P <0.001; ** P <0.01; * P <0.05 by unpaired two-tailed t- test.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Nasal tissue-resident memory CD4 + T cells persist after influenza A virus infection and provide heterosubtypic protection

    doi: 10.1101/2024.07.06.602325

    Figure Lengend Snippet: NT CD4 TRM rely on CXCR6-CXCL16 axis for their formation A) Box plot showing the expression of Cxcr6 mRNA among CD4 TRM of the NT and lungs. Data are presented as median and interquartile range. NS, not significant, **** P <0.0001; *** P <0.001; ** P <0.01; * P <0.05 by unpaired two-tailed t-test. B) Box plot showing the expression of Cxcr6 mRNA among different cell clusters of lungs and NT. Data are presented as median and interquartile range. NS, not significant, **** P <0.0001; *** P <0.001; ** P <0.01; * P <0.05 by Wilcoxon rank sum test with Benjamini-Hochberg correction C) Volcano plot for differential expressed genes in the NT in comparison to the lungs of the Th17 cluster. The dotted lines indicate fold change and adjusted p value cutoffs. D) Bar plot for the expression of CXCR6 (each Median Fluorescence Intensity (MFI) normalized to mean MFI from CD4 TEM iv + of NT) in CD4 TRM and iv + CD4 TEM from the lungs and NT of naïve mice and PR8 IAV infected mice (30 dpi) as indicated. The experiment was repeated thrice and the results (mean ± s.e.m.) are pooled. NS, not significant, **** P <0.0001; *** P <0.001; ** P <0.01; * P <0.05 by two-way ANOVA, with Tukey’s multiple comparison test. E-F) Expression of CXCR6 on OT-II CD4 TRM of NT and lung on d30 following PR8-Ova infection as indicated. E) Representative histograms for CXCR6 expression from OT-II CD4 TRM of NT and lung are shown. F) Scatter plot showing the expression of CXCR6 (each Median Fluorescence Intensity (MFI) normalized to mean MFI of NT OT-II CD4 TRM). The experiment was repeated thrice and the results (mean ± s.e.m.) are pooled. NS, not significant, **** P <0.0001; *** P <0.001; ** P <0.01; * P <0.05 by unpaired two- tailed t-test. G-J) Frequency of different cell populations within different organs derived from WT- Cxcr6 -/- BM chimeric mice on day 30 post infection with PR8 IAV as indicated. G) Schematic representation of the experimental setup. H) Representative flow cytometry plots showing the percentage of WT and Cxcr6 -/- CD4 TRM in NT and lungs. I) Scatter plot for the percentage of WT and Cxcr6 -/- CD4 TRM in NT and lungs as indicated. J) Scatter plot for the percentage of I-A b NP306-322 tetramer - specific WT and Cxcr6 -/- CD4 TRM in NT and lungs as indicated. The experiment was repeated thrice and the results (mean ± s.e.m.) are pooled. NS, not significant, **** P <0.0001; *** P <0.001; ** P <0.01; * P <0.05 by unpaired two-tailed t-test. K) A representative microscopic image of CXCL16 expression (magenta) and OT-II CD4 T cells (red and green) in the olfactory epithelium of the murine NT. NT is isolated on day 30 post PR8-Ova infection from mice that received OT-II CD4 T cells. L-N) Antigen-specific CD4 TRM in the lungs and NT of mice treated with isotype control or anti-CXCL16 antibody on day 10 post PR8 IAV infection. L) Schematic representation of the experimental setup. M) Representative flow cytometry plots indicating the percentage of I-A b NP306-322 tetramer - specific CD4 TRM are shown. N) Scatter plot indicating the absolute number of I-A b NP306-322 tetramer - specific CD4 TRM. The experiment was performed twice and the results (mean ± s.e.m.) are pooled. NS, not significant, **** P <0.0001; *** P <0.001; ** P <0.01; * P <0.05 by unpaired two-tailed t- test.

    Article Snippet: Mouse CXCL16 antibody (MAB503) was purchased from R&D systems and was dissolved in 1X PBS.

    Techniques: Expressing, Two Tailed Test, Comparison, Fluorescence, Infection, Derivative Assay, Flow Cytometry, Isolation, Control